Roymech engineering encyclopedia

Loaded Flat Plates – Stress and Deflection


This page provides engineering formulas and coefficients for estimating stress and deflection in thin flat plates subjected to transverse loading. Configurations include circular and rectangular plates, plates with central holes, uniform pressure loading and concentrated loads, with simply supported or clamped boundary conditions.

Need help choosing a mechanics or stress analysis method? See the Mechanics and Stress Analysis Guide for guidance on forces, motion, loading, stress, strain, yielding, buckling, pressure vessels, rotating components, torsion and plate analysis.
Small-deflection plate theory: The equations on this page are intended for thin plates undergoing elastic, small-deflection bending. They should not be used without further analysis where deflection becomes significant compared with plate thickness, where membrane action develops, or where yielding, instability, local loading or non-ideal support conditions govern the behaviour.

Contents


Plate Theory and Assumptions

The equations and coefficients on this page provide estimates of maximum stress and deflection for flat plates under a number of common loading and support conditions.

They are based on classical thin-plate bending assumptions. In particular:

  • the plate is initially flat;
  • the plate thickness is small compared with its other dimensions;
  • deflection is small compared with the plate thickness;
  • the material is homogeneous, isotropic and linearly elastic;
  • Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio remain constant;
  • the loading and boundary conditions correspond to the configuration shown;
  • local stress concentrations and local contact effects are not represented by the simple plate equations.

The original RoyMech calculations were prepared principally for steel plates using a Poisson's ratio of approximately 0.3. Where coefficients or equations have been derived using this value, they should not automatically be applied to materials having substantially different Poisson's ratios.

The original notes also limited their use to plates having a thickness less than approximately 10% of the relevant plate span or diameter. This is a useful screening rule rather than a complete definition of thin-plate behaviour.

Boundary conditions matter. A plate described as simply supported or clamped represents an idealised boundary condition. Real joints, frames, welds, bolts and contact surfaces may provide intermediate restraint. The calculated stress and deflection can therefore be sensitive to how closely the real structure reproduces the assumed support condition.

For the simply supported rectangular-plate cases on this page, the loaded plate edges are assumed to remain in contact with their supports and to be restrained from lifting away from them.

These equations are suitable for preliminary calculations and engineering estimates. For critical design, unusual geometry, large deflection, local loading or more accurate stress determination, a recognised plate reference such as Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain, an appropriate analytical method or validated finite-element analysis should be used.


Symbols and Units

Symbol Description Typical SI Unit
a Major dimension of rectangular plate; for annular configurations see individual diagram m
b Minor dimension of rectangular plate; for annular configurations see individual diagram m
r Radius of circular plate m
t Plate thickness m
p Uniform transverse pressure Pa (N/m2)
P Concentrated transverse force N
σm Maximum plate bending stress Pa or MPa
ym Maximum transverse deflection m
E Young's modulus Pa
ν Poisson's ratio dimensionless
D Plate flexural rigidity N m
k1, k2, k3 Dimensionless plate coefficients defined for the individual load case —

Plate Flexural Rigidity

For a homogeneous isotropic plate:

D = E t3 12 1 − ν2

The cubic dependence on thickness is particularly important: plate bending stiffness changes rapidly with plate thickness.


Circular Plates

Uniform Load – Simply Supported Edge

Circular plate subjected to uniform transverse pressure with the outer edge simply supported.

Circular plate under uniform pressure with simply supported outer edge

Stress and deflection equations for a simply supported circular plate under uniform pressure

Uniform Load – Clamped Edge

Circular plate subjected to uniform transverse pressure with the outer edge clamped.

Circular plate under uniform pressure with clamped outer edge

Stress and deflection equations for a clamped circular plate under uniform pressure

Central Concentrated Load – Simply Supported Edge

Circular plate subjected to a concentrated transverse load at its centre, with the outer edge simply supported.

Circular plate with central concentrated load and simply supported outer edge

Stress and deflection equations for a simply supported circular plate with central load

Central Concentrated Load – Clamped Edge

Circular plate subjected to a concentrated transverse load at its centre, with the outer edge clamped.

Circular plate with central concentrated load and clamped outer edge

Stress and deflection equations for a clamped circular plate with central load

Rectangular Plates

The response of a rectangular plate depends strongly on its aspect ratio a/b as well as its loading and support conditions.

Uniform Load – Simply Supported Edges

Rectangular plate subjected to uniform transverse pressure with simply supported edges.

Simply supported rectangular plate under uniform transverse pressure

Stress and deflection equations for a simply supported rectangular plate under uniform pressure

Uniform Load – Clamped Edges

Rectangular plate subjected to uniform transverse pressure with clamped edges.

Clamped rectangular plate under uniform transverse pressure

Stress and deflection equations for a clamped rectangular plate under uniform pressure

Central Concentrated Load – Simply Supported Edges

Simply supported rectangular plate with concentrated load at centre

Stress and deflection equations for a simply supported rectangular plate with central concentrated load

Coefficient Aspect Ratio a/b
1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 3.0 ≥ 4
k1 0.127 0.138 0.148 0.162 0.170 0.177 0.180 0.185 0.185
k2 0.435 0.565 0.650 0.789 0.875 0.927 0.958 1.000 0.000*
Legacy-data check: The original RoyMech table gives k2 = 0.000 for a/b ≥ 4. This value is retained here so that the historical table is not silently altered, but it should be independently verified against the original plate-data source before being used in a calculation.

Central Concentrated Load – Clamped Edges

Clamped rectangular plate with concentrated load at centre

Stress and deflection equations for a clamped rectangular plate with central concentrated load

Coefficient a/b = 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 ≥ 3
k1 0.061 0.071 0.076 0.078 0.0786 0.0788 0.0791
k2 0.754 0.894 0.962 0.991 1.000 1.004 1.008
k3 -0.238 -0.0078 0.011 0.053 0.068 0.067 0.067

The sign of a plate coefficient can identify the sense of the associated bending stress or moment according to the convention used in the accompanying equation. A negative coefficient should therefore not automatically be treated as an error.


Circular Plates with Central Holes

The following cases apply to annular plates. For these configurations the dimensions a and b and the ratio a/b are defined by the individual diagrams. Use the geometry shown with each equation rather than transferring the rectangular-plate definitions of a and b.

Concentrated Load at Hole – Simply Supported Outer Edge

Annular circular plate with concentrated load at central hole and simply supported outer edge

a/b k1 k2
1.250.3410.100
1.50.5191.26
20.6721.48
3*0.7341.88
40.7242.17
50.7042.34
Transcription correction: The previous HTML displayed the fourth aspect ratio as 33. Its position in the sequence 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5 strongly indicates a typographical duplication and it is shown here as 3. The underlying coefficient values should nevertheless be checked against the original reference before use in critical design.

Uniform Load over Ring – Simply Supported Outer Edge

Annular plate under uniform distributed load with simply supported outer edge

a/b k1 k2
1.250.1840.592
1.50.4140.976
20.6641.44
30.8241.88
40.8302.08
50.8132.190

Concentrated Load at Hole – Clamped Outer Edge

Annular plate with concentrated load at central hole and clamped outer edge

a/b k1 k2
1.250.005040.194
1.50.02420.320
20.08100.454
30.1720.673
40.2171.021
50.2381.305

Uniform Load over Ring – Clamped Outer Edge

Annular plate under uniform distributed load with clamped outer edge

a/b k1 k2
1.250.001990.105
1.50.01390.259
20.05750.480
30.1300.657
40.1620.710
50.1750.730

Circular Plates with Guided Central Holes

Uniform Distributed Load – Simply Supported Outer Edge

Annular plate with guided central hole, uniform load and simply supported outer edge

a/b k1 k2
1.250.003430.122
1.50.03130.336
20.1250.740
30.2211.210
40.4171.450
50.4921.590

Uniform Distributed Load – Fixed Outer Edge

Annular plate with guided central hole, uniform load and fixed outer edge

a/b k1 k2
100.1490.728
30.0740.58
20.0230.36
1.50.0030.151
1.1—0.019
Legacy coefficient data: The annular-plate coefficients above have been retained from the original RoyMech data rather than recalculated or replaced. For critical work they should be verified against the reference from which the particular plate solution was derived.

Using the Plate Data

A plate calculation is only meaningful when the geometry, loading and boundary conditions match the selected solution.

  1. Identify whether the plate is circular, rectangular or annular.
  2. Determine whether the load is distributed pressure or a concentrated force.
  3. Identify the actual support condition.
  4. Check that thin-plate and small-deflection assumptions are reasonable.
  5. Use the equation and coefficient set corresponding to that exact configuration.
  6. Use a consistent system of units throughout the calculation.
  7. Compare the resulting stress with an appropriate material design criterion.
  8. Check deflection against the functional requirements of the component.
  9. Consider local stresses, fatigue, instability and other failure modes where relevant.

Small and Large Deflection

Classical small-deflection plate theory assumes that transverse deflection does not significantly alter the geometry of the plate or introduce important in-plane membrane forces.

As deflection becomes comparable with plate thickness, membrane action can become significant and the load-deflection relationship becomes nonlinear. The equations on this page should then be replaced by an appropriate large-deflection plate analysis.

Concentrated Loads

An ideal mathematical point load can produce highly localised stresses. Actual engineering loads are normally transferred through a finite contact area, washer, boss, bearing surface or attachment. Local bearing, bending, punching, yielding or contact stresses may therefore require separate assessment.

Stress Interpretation

The maximum bending stresses calculated by classical plate theory are nominal elastic stresses for the idealised plate model. Holes, welds, sharp changes in thickness, attachments and other geometric details can introduce local stress concentrations that are not represented by these simple solutions.


Related RoyMech References

External References and Calculation Resources

  1. MITCalc – Plates – plate calculation software and engineering calculations.
  2. Plate Theory – Wikipedia – general background on classical plate theory.
  3. ExcelCalcs – Plates – engineering spreadsheets and plate calculations.
  4. RoyMech / ExcelCalcs Plate Calculation – spreadsheet implementation of the plate equations historically associated with this RoyMech page.


�