Roymech engineering encyclopedia

Yield and Failure Criteria for Multiaxial Stress


Engineering components are frequently subjected to combined normal and shear stresses rather than simple uniaxial loading. A yield or failure criterion is therefore required to compare a multiaxial stress state with material strength data obtained from standard tests.

Need help choosing a mechanics or stress analysis method? See the Mechanics and Stress Analysis Guide for guidance on forces, motion, loading, stress, strain, yielding, buckling, pressure vessels, rotating components, torsion and plate analysis.

This page summarises the classical maximum principal stress, maximum shear stress, distortion energy and maximum strain energy criteria. The appropriate criterion depends on the material behaviour and the type of failure being assessed.

Contents


Introduction

Under a simple uniaxial tensile test, yielding or fracture can be related directly to measured material properties such as yield strength, proof strength and ultimate tensile strength. Under a multiaxial state of stress, failure cannot generally be assessed by considering only one Cartesian stress component.

Failure theories reduce the combined stress state to a criterion that can be compared with an appropriate material strength obtained from a simpler test.

Ductile and Brittle Behaviour

Metals are often broadly classified as ductile or brittle according to their deformation and fracture behaviour.

Ductile metals normally undergo appreciable plastic deformation before fracture. Some exhibit a distinct yield point, while others are characterised using a specified proof strength. A common engineering value is the 0.2% proof stress.

Brittle materials generally exhibit relatively little plastic deformation before fracture. Cast irons, ceramics and some high-strength or low-temperature metal conditions can display brittle behaviour, although actual behaviour depends on material condition, stress state, temperature, loading rate, geometry and environment.

Terminology: For ductile materials, the usual design event considered by Tresca and von Mises is the onset of yielding, not ultimate fracture. For brittle materials, fracture criteria based on principal stresses or other brittle-fracture models may be more appropriate.

Common Classical Criteria

  • Maximum principal stress theory (Rankine) – principally of historical and practical relevance to brittle failure where normal stress is dominant.
  • Maximum shear stress theory (Tresca-Guest) – widely used yield criterion for ductile materials and generally conservative relative to von Mises.
  • Distortion energy theory (von Mises-Hencky) – widely used yield criterion for isotropic ductile metals.
  • Maximum strain energy theory – classical historical criterion based on total elastic strain energy; less commonly used for modern ductile-metal design.

Principal Stresses

At a point in a stressed body there are three mutually perpendicular principal planes on which the shear stress is zero. The corresponding normal stresses are the principal stresses:

σ1 ≥ σ2 ≥ σ3

For plane stress with Cartesian stresses σx, σy and τxy, the two in-plane principal stresses are:

σ1,2 = σx + σy 2 ± σx − σy 2 2 + τxy2

For plane stress, the third principal stress is zero:

σ3 = 0

when the two calculated in-plane values are labelled separately from the out-of-plane stress. For use with three-dimensional criteria, all three values must then be reordered so that σ1 ≥ σ2 ≥ σ3.

See the RoyMech Mohr's Circle reference for stress transformation and graphical determination of principal stresses.


Maximum Principal Stress Theory – Rankine

The maximum principal stress theory is commonly associated with Rankine. In its simplest form, failure is predicted when a principal normal stress reaches the corresponding limiting stress measured under uniaxial loading.

For a material having different tensile and compressive strengths, the principal stresses should be checked against the appropriate tensile and compressive limits:

σmax ≤ St n | σmin | ≤ Sc n

where:

  • St = allowable reference tensile strength;
  • Sc = allowable reference compressive strength;
  • n = factor of safety.

For a material whose tensile limit governs, the corresponding factor of safety may be written:

n = St σmax
Application: Rankine's criterion is not normally preferred for predicting yielding of ductile metals under general multiaxial stress. It is more relevant as a simple normal-stress criterion for brittle behaviour, but real brittle fracture can require more sophisticated criteria, particularly where tensile and compressive strengths differ substantially.

Maximum Shear Stress Theory – Tresca

The maximum shear stress theory is associated with Tresca and Guest and is widely used for predicting the onset of yielding in ductile materials.

In a uniaxial tensile test at yield:

σ1 = Sy , σ2 = σ3 = 0

The maximum shear stress at yield is therefore:

τmax,y = Sy 2

For a general three-dimensional stress state with:

σ1 ≥ σ2 ≥ σ3

the maximum shear stress is:

τmax = σ1 − σ3 2

Tresca predicts yielding when:

σ1 − σ3 ≥ Sy

The Tresca equivalent stress can therefore be defined as:

σTresca = max | σ1 − σ2 | , | σ2 − σ3 | , | σ3 − σ1 |

and the factor of safety against yielding is:

n = Sy σTresca

Combined Direct Stress and Shear Stress

For the common plane-stress case consisting of a direct stress σx combined with shear stress τxy, with σy = 0, the principal stresses are:

σ1,2 = σx 2 ± σx 2 2 + τxy2

For this stress state, the Tresca equivalent stress becomes:

σTresca = σx2 + 4 τxy2

and:

n = Sy σx2 + 4 τxy2
Engineering note: Tresca is often convenient for hand calculations and is conservative relative to von Mises for many multiaxial ductile-metal stress states. Both criteria give the same result for simple uniaxial tension.

Distortion Energy Theory – von Mises

The distortion energy theory, commonly called the von Mises or von Mises-Hencky criterion, is widely used to predict yielding of homogeneous isotropic ductile metals.

Elastic strain energy can be separated into a volumetric component associated with change in volume and a distortional component associated with change in shape. The von Mises criterion relates yielding to the distortional component of the stress state.

Principal-Stress Form

The von Mises equivalent stress in terms of the three principal stresses is:

σvm = σ1 − σ2 2 + σ2 − σ3 2 + σ3 − σ1 2 2

Yielding is predicted when:

σvm ≥ Sy

and the corresponding factor of safety against initial yielding is:

n = Sy σvm

Three-Dimensional Cartesian Stress Form

For normal stresses σx, σy, σz and shear stresses τxy, τyz and τzx:

σvm2 = 1 2 [ σx − σy 2 + σy − σz 2 + σz − σx 2 + 6 τxy2 + τyz2 + τzx2 ]

Plane Stress

For plane stress, where σz = τyz = τzx = 0:

σvm = σx2 − σx σy + σy2 + 3 τxy2

Combined Direct Stress and Shear

For the common case:

σy = 0

with direct stress σx and shear stress τxy:

σvm = σx2 + 3 τxy2

and:

n = Sy σx2 + 3 τxy2

Pure Shear

For a state of pure shear τ, the von Mises equivalent stress is:

σvm = 3 τ

Therefore von Mises predicts shear yielding at:

τy = Sy 3 ≈ 0.577 Sy

By comparison, Tresca predicts:

τy = Sy 2 = 0.5 Sy

This illustrates the greater conservatism of Tresca for this stress state.


Maximum Strain Energy Theory

The maximum strain energy theory is a classical elastic failure criterion associated with total elastic strain energy. It assumes that failure occurs when the total strain energy per unit volume reaches the value corresponding to failure or yielding in a uniaxial tensile test.

For an isotropic linear-elastic material subjected to principal stresses σ1, σ2 and σ3, the total elastic strain energy per unit volume is:

U = 1 2E σ12 + σ22 + σ32 − 2ν σ1 σ2 + σ2 σ3 + σ3 σ1

For uniaxial yielding at stress Sy:

Uy = Sy2 2E

The maximum strain energy criterion therefore predicts yielding when:

σ12 + σ22 + σ32 − 2ν σ1 σ2 + σ2 σ3 + σ3 σ1 ≥ Sy2
Historical criterion: The maximum strain energy theory is important in the development of classical failure theories, but it is generally not preferred for predicting yielding of ductile metals. Tresca and particularly von Mises are more commonly used for that purpose.

Comparison of Yield and Failure Criteria

Criterion Primary quantity Typical use Comment
Maximum principal stress
(Rankine)
Largest principal normal stress Brittle-material assessment Simple criterion; tensile and compressive strength should be considered separately where appropriate.
Maximum shear stress
(Tresca)
Maximum difference between principal stresses Ductile-metal yielding Simple and conservative; convenient for hand calculations.
Distortion energy
(von Mises)
Distortional component of stress state Ductile-metal yielding Widely used and generally agrees well with yielding of isotropic ductile metals.
Maximum strain energy Total elastic strain energy Classical / historical analysis Less commonly used for modern ductile-metal yield assessment.
Criterion selection: No single failure theory describes every material and failure mechanism. Yield criteria such as Tresca and von Mises should not be used as universal fracture, fatigue, buckling, creep or brittle-fracture criteria. The governing failure mechanism and appropriate material data must be identified for the application.

Related RoyMech Mechanics References

Other Mechanics References

External Failure-Criteria References

  1. Failure Criteria – eFunda – engineering reference covering common material failure criteria.
  2. Chapter 15: Theories of Yielding – Victoria University – reference material on classical yield theories.
  3. Solid Mechanics – Wikibooks – general solid-mechanics reference.


�