Engineering components are frequently subjected to combined normal and shear stresses rather than simple uniaxial loading. A yield or failure criterion is therefore required to compare a multiaxial stress state with material strength data obtained from standard tests.
This page summarises the classical maximum principal stress, maximum shear stress, distortion energy and maximum strain energy criteria. The appropriate criterion depends on the material behaviour and the type of failure being assessed.
Under a simple uniaxial tensile test, yielding or fracture can be related directly to measured material properties such as yield strength, proof strength and ultimate tensile strength. Under a multiaxial state of stress, failure cannot generally be assessed by considering only one Cartesian stress component.
Failure theories reduce the combined stress state to a criterion that can be compared with an appropriate material strength obtained from a simpler test.
Metals are often broadly classified as ductile or brittle according to their deformation and fracture behaviour.
Ductile metals normally undergo appreciable plastic deformation before fracture. Some exhibit a distinct yield point, while others are characterised using a specified proof strength. A common engineering value is the 0.2% proof stress.
Brittle materials generally exhibit relatively little plastic deformation before fracture. Cast irons, ceramics and some high-strength or low-temperature metal conditions can display brittle behaviour, although actual behaviour depends on material condition, stress state, temperature, loading rate, geometry and environment.
At a point in a stressed body there are three mutually perpendicular principal planes on which the shear stress is zero. The corresponding normal stresses are the principal stresses:
For plane stress with Cartesian stresses σx, σy and τxy, the two in-plane principal stresses are:
For plane stress, the third principal stress is zero:
when the two calculated in-plane values are labelled separately from the out-of-plane stress. For use with three-dimensional criteria, all three values must then be reordered so that σ1 ≥ σ2 ≥ σ3.
See the RoyMech Mohr's Circle reference for stress transformation and graphical determination of principal stresses.
The maximum principal stress theory is commonly associated with Rankine. In its simplest form, failure is predicted when a principal normal stress reaches the corresponding limiting stress measured under uniaxial loading.
For a material having different tensile and compressive strengths, the principal stresses should be checked against the appropriate tensile and compressive limits:
where:
For a material whose tensile limit governs, the corresponding factor of safety may be written:
The maximum shear stress theory is associated with Tresca and Guest and is widely used for predicting the onset of yielding in ductile materials.
In a uniaxial tensile test at yield:
The maximum shear stress at yield is therefore:
For a general three-dimensional stress state with:
the maximum shear stress is:
Tresca predicts yielding when:
The Tresca equivalent stress can therefore be defined as:
and the factor of safety against yielding is:
For the common plane-stress case consisting of a direct stress σx combined with shear stress τxy, with σy = 0, the principal stresses are:
For this stress state, the Tresca equivalent stress becomes:
and:
The distortion energy theory, commonly called the von Mises or von Mises-Hencky criterion, is widely used to predict yielding of homogeneous isotropic ductile metals.
Elastic strain energy can be separated into a volumetric component associated with change in volume and a distortional component associated with change in shape. The von Mises criterion relates yielding to the distortional component of the stress state.
The von Mises equivalent stress in terms of the three principal stresses is:
Yielding is predicted when:
and the corresponding factor of safety against initial yielding is:
For normal stresses σx, σy, σz and shear stresses τxy, τyz and τzx:
For plane stress, where σz = τyz = τzx = 0:
For the common case:
with direct stress σx and shear stress τxy:
and:
For a state of pure shear τ, the von Mises equivalent stress is:
Therefore von Mises predicts shear yielding at:
By comparison, Tresca predicts:
This illustrates the greater conservatism of Tresca for this stress state.
The maximum strain energy theory is a classical elastic failure criterion associated with total elastic strain energy. It assumes that failure occurs when the total strain energy per unit volume reaches the value corresponding to failure or yielding in a uniaxial tensile test.
For an isotropic linear-elastic material subjected to principal stresses σ1, σ2 and σ3, the total elastic strain energy per unit volume is:
For uniaxial yielding at stress Sy:
The maximum strain energy criterion therefore predicts yielding when:
| Criterion | Primary quantity | Typical use | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum principal stress (Rankine) |
Largest principal normal stress | Brittle-material assessment | Simple criterion; tensile and compressive strength should be considered separately where appropriate. |
| Maximum shear stress (Tresca) |
Maximum difference between principal stresses | Ductile-metal yielding | Simple and conservative; convenient for hand calculations. |
| Distortion energy (von Mises) |
Distortional component of stress state | Ductile-metal yielding | Widely used and generally agrees well with yielding of isotropic ductile metals. |
| Maximum strain energy | Total elastic strain energy | Classical / historical analysis | Less commonly used for modern ductile-metal yield assessment. |